Archives

All posts by Nan Mykel

Sticky Fingers Reblog

Published September 6, 2021 by Nan Mykel

Precious!

lifelessons's avatarlifelessons - a blog by Judy Dykstra-Brown

Sticky Fingers

Gram’s a kleptomaniac. It’s known all over town.
She’ll glom onto anything the neighbors don’t tie down.
It’s obvious what she’s up to, for she takes no pains to hide it.
She’ll peer into the coffee spout to see what is inside it
and if it isn’t boiling hot, she’ll make off with the whole of it.
She’ll steal anything in sight, for “need” is not the goal of it.

She collects things in the daylight and sneaks out after dark.
She has no fear of guard dogs. She’s not warned off by their bark.
Unabashed, she faces up to every cluck and frown
as she steals coins from collection plates of every church in town.
My dad makes restitution and gives them more besides
while my mom checks out the stashes of everything she hides

and returns things to their owners. It’s become her daily chore
and…

View original post 171 more words

They Cost You Nothing; They Have No Value

Published September 5, 2021 by Nan Mykel

While re-organizing, I came across the following poem by a member of our Poetry group, and have graciously been permitted to share it with you.  It is by Patricia L.H. Black, written in 2/2018.  An earlier poem of hers can be found on my Flash Fiction and Poe/try Page, titled “What’s Wrong With This Picture?”

 

I don’t want your thoughts and prayers.

They are as hollow as they are hackneyed.

What good are they in my time of grief?

I want my daughter back!

 

I don’t want your thoughts and prayers.

I want to know how you calculate

Just how blood money covers a living child.

I want my grandson back!!

 

I don’t want your thoughts and prayers.

Just tell me: Do you ever try to wash

The bloodstains from your heart and soul?

I want my fiance back!

 

I don’t want your thoughts and prayers.

Do the torn and shattered bodies

Ever disturb you in your sleep?

I want my neighbor back!

 

I don’t want your thoughts and prayers.

You know where you can put

Those thoughts and prayers.

I want my country back!

Sunday Serious Sermon …. “⚖️ ‘Sonia Sotomayor – I Dissent’ ⚖️ …. “!!

Published September 5, 2021 by Nan Mykel

A Lysistrada approach has been suggested by others. Talk about Russian roulette!

Dr. Rex's avatarIt Is What It Is

~~September 5, 2021~~

I DISSENT

The SCOTUS ‘non-decision’ handed down on September 1, basically rendered null and void precent of almost 50 years of women’s reproductive rights under Roe v Wade.

It was a 5-4 decision – handed down by the ‘Federalist Court‘. 4 judges dissented: Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Elena Kagan, Justice Breyer and Justice Sotomayor.

Here’s Justice Sotomayor’s dissent!!

HortyRex©

#SundaySeriousSermon #SCOTUS #TexasAbortionLaw #Libera;lJustices #DefiantDessent #SoniaSotomayor #StunningOrder #FederalPrecents #Astounding #ShadowDocket #DesignedToAvoidJudicialReview #InflictsSignificantHarm

#WeAllAreOne #ItIsWhatItIs #DrRex #HortyRex #hrexachwordpress

View original post

Quanta Reblog – Seems Kinda Important

Published September 5, 2021 by Nan Mykel

To Learn More Quickly, Brain Cells Break Their DNA — Jordana Cepelewicz  Staff Writer   Quanta Magazine August 30, 2021

New work shows that neurons and other brain cells use DNA double-strand breaks, often associated with cancer, neurodegeneration and aging, to quickly express genes related to learning and memory.  Double-strand breaks in DNA, usually viewed as a dangerous form of genetic damage, can also play a crucial role in normal cellular processes.
Faced with a threat, the brain has to act fast, its neurons making new connections to learn what might spell the difference between life and death. But in its response, the brain also raises the stakes: As an unsettling recent discovery shows, to express learning and memory genes more quickly, brain cells snap their DNA into pieces at many key points, and then rebuild their fractured genome later.

Keith Says (Reblog)

Published September 3, 2021 by Nan Mykel

Image added by Nan

On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 8:38 AM Keith Wilson  wrote:

When laypeople are asked to say a key tenet of the Hippocratic Oath, we usually will stumble then say a doctor is asked to do no harm.
Per Wikipedia, The Hippocratic Oath is an oath of ethics historically taken by physicians. It is one of the most widely known of Greek medical texts. In its original form, it requires a new physician to swear, by a number of healing gods, to uphold specific ethical standards. The oath is the earliest expression of medical ethics in the Western world, establishing several principles of medical ethics which remain of paramount significance today. These include the principles of medical confidentiality and non-maleficence. As the seminal articulation of certain principles that continue to guide and inform medical practice, the ancient text is of more than historic and symbolic value. Swearing a modified form of the oath remains a rite of passage for medical graduates in many countries, and is a requirement enshrined in legal statutes of various jurisdictions, such that violations of the oath may carry criminal or other liability beyond the oath’s symbolic nature.

Doctors practice the art and science of medicine. Since the human body has a lot of moving, interrelated parts, determining what ails someone can be an onerous and sometimes, incomplete task. Doctors tend to do the best they can, but they are not perfect, just as we patients are not. But, I take comfort in the oath they take of non-maleficence or to do no harm to the patients.

The US and other places continue to have politicians and pseudo-news sycophants make wedge issues out of our health. Wearing a mask and taking vaccine have even been equated with Nazism. Really? Recognizing that some may have legitimate reasons for raising questions, there are far too many who have made this a sophomoric tribal battle. And, there are too many willing to listen to people who are sharing their opinion, but their smugness makes folks believe it as gospel.

What I have said time and time again is ask you doctor. They are supposed to have your best interests at heart and must adhere to that do no harm requirement. In fact, doctors most often will err on the side of caution. And, having visited two of my doctors lately, the doctors, nurses, and receptionists were all wearing masks. Now, why would they do that?

The laypeople and politicians who share their opinions are not obligated by that do no harm rule. So, do not take their opinions for anything more than what they are, including mine. If you are uncertain about the vaccine, check with your doctor. If you are uncertain about wearing masks, check with your doctor. And, if a store, town or state says we need to show proof of vaccination and/ or wear a mask, then I would suggest you abide by those rules. It should be noted that in the past ten days, three popular anti-vax radio hosts have all passed away due to COVID. It makes me sad for them and their families to see them lose their life for a poor decision.

PREFACE

Published September 1, 2021 by Nan Mykel

I’VE LIVED A LONG LIFE

My professional graduate training did not prepare me for doing therapy with sex offenders, much less incest offenders. When I was scheduled to interview an alleged incest offender at the mental health center where I first worked after graduation, I hesitated. I  would have gladly transferred him to another clinician if one had been available. Inadequate and unprepared for the task and the client,  I don’t know who was more anxious, the alleged offender or  me.

I remained ignorant about the treatment of sex offenders until I joined the psychology staff of a state prison. Shortly thereafter, my warden assigned me the task of starting a sex offender treatment program.

Since I had been molested by both my paternal grandfather and my father, I experienced the assignment as both a professional challenge and a personal one, which it turned out to be, on both counts. 

An early realization was that at the visceral level, offenders do not believe their sexual abuse harmed their victim. That is why this volume contains the hefty section on the effects of sexual abuse, especially incest.

The content of this book is frank. It is an attempt to by-pass denial, not to feed old resentments; to lift spirits, not to dampen them. I have changed names to protect the innocent and the guilty. I kept my abuse secret from my children because I was embarrassed about it, didn’t want to appear to make excuses or to present myself as a cripple, and was concerned that I might provide them with a loser’s script. I was afraid to be myself for fear of contaminating them.

Sandra Butler writes,   Perhaps the only lessons we have for our children are the truths about our lives.—whatever those truths are—for that is all we know.  (1985, 142-43)

Incest is real. It hurts the victim, the family, future children, future spouses, and even the perpetrator. Denial permits incest to continue unchecked. This volume’s intent is to explore in depth the machinations of incest and its effects.  The following information may be particularly helpful for the unreported offender whose secrecy bars him from treatment.

The tendrils of incest may reach down through generations to silently claim unsuspecting prey within the family circle. With stealth and intent, the invisible intruder leeches off both joy and harmony while the family, ignorant that it has been attacked by one of its own, leaves the victim alone without protection or redress.

The incest offender is that invisible intruder, and may be himself a link in an older family pattern. (There is, however, no evidence  that most victims will become abusers.)

What is incest anyway? Incest is the use of children or adolescents for sexual gratification by their caregiver.

Incest offenders can be divided into blood and non-blood incest offenders. The only significance of this distinction is to stress the fact that incest involves the violation of trust, and may include stepfathers, teachers, priests,  coaches, scout leaders, etc. The emphasis is on the unequal power  and influence over the child. This is especially obvious when the perpetrator purposefully builds rapport and friendship with the intended victim, a common practice known as grooming. Not surprisingly, the closer the relationship between the caregiver and the child, the greater its destructiveness. 

I can attest to the latter statement. Although my paternal grandfather molested me as a very young child, I always saw him as somehow “different,” and I never felt close to him. My father was another story, and I believe he caused much more damage precisely because our previous relationship had been close. The molestation by my father may have also built upon vulnerabilities inflicted on me by my grandfather.

(MORE TO FOLLOW NEXT WEDNESDAY)

 

CONFESSION

Published August 31, 2021 by Nan Mykel
DEAR DAUGHTER
 
I burned the soup
 you made me.
To confess or not?
(She’ll read this and 
know I fell asleep at
computer.)
She tended my soup so
carefully with love and
I burned it all.
So sorry. I cannot 
lie so wrote this to you
now back in Atlanta.
Love,  Mom

SUPERSTITION CAN BE FUN

Published August 30, 2021 by Nan Mykel

I was first a Christian, then an agnostic, next an atheist then back to an agnostic, but secretly I think being superstitious might be a lot of fun.

So, today as I was sitting in my rocker beside my bookcase, I shut my eyes and reached for any book and, eyes still closed, I opened it and discovered that the book Consilience by E.O. Wilson contained, on page 203, a possible answer as to why Ivanka Trump refused to read a novel about poor people, as reported in my earlier post today (Money Talks).

E.O. Wilson  wrote that “in order to preserve their wealth, the rich  take measures to avoid meeting and falling in love with the poor.”

Apparently Ivanka WAS BEING CAREFUL!

MONEY TALKS…AND GRANNY D IN CAPITOL ARREST

Published August 30, 2021 by Nan Mykel

Image:   Granny D

SNOOTY TALKS WITH POOPY [aka poor folks]

“Why would you tell me to read a book about fucking poor people,” Ivanka once asked her friend, as reported by that former friend Lysandria Ohrstrom at  <https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/11/ivanka-trump-was-my-best-friend-now-shes-maga-royalty> .

SNOOT:  Good question!

POOP:  I have a problem understanding your values.

SNOOT:  No news you’ve got problems.

POOP:  So you feel the same way as Ivanka?

SNOOT:  Reading about failures is for the birds.

POOP:  The poor are failures at…?

SNOOT:  Upward mobility; power; belonging; the elite; money; prestige; status; fame…the way they dress

POOP:  How about honesty?

SNOOT:  Honesty is for the gullible,  ignorant, and those who don’t know how to read the playbook.

POOP:  Honesty’s no good?

SNOOT:  They have to be protected from honesty; they might panic.

POOP:  Who are these poor people, anyway?

SNOOT:  Oh, you know–dropouts, addicts, gender-scramblers, blacks, refugees, the homeless,  convicts, dirt farmers–the undercrust in general.

POOP:  Are there no more good people?

SNOOT:  Oh sure–Warren Buffet, The Koch  brothers, the Waltons, Jeff Bezos, …I just read that one monied gentleman charges people $6500 to be airlifted out of Afghanistan.  You see, the poor can’t even pay for their own lives.  Who’d want to read about such losers?

POOP:  What about the “salt of the earth” folks?

SNOOT: Peons!  You know what to do with peons, don’t you?

POOP:  Don’t say it.

SNOOT: If we paid everybody a decent salary,  our corporations would fail, and they are the backbone of our economy..

POOP:  How did your corporations get so strong-armed?

SNOOT:  It’s a wonderful story. Let me tell you…. In 2009 SCOTUS heard arguments in Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission and decided the lawsuit in 2010, to give corporations, Unions and other groups the right to pump as much money as they wanted into the political system. It  became law in 2010. It was a matter of freedom of speech–corporations could count as people, too,  since they’re made up of people, and they have more money than the  individual people, or any other group.  See how clever we can be?

POOP:  Sounds clever, but not democratic.

SNOOT:  Of course it’s democratic!  Didn’t you hear what I just said?  Corporations are people, too, and have a lot more clout!

POOP: But isn’t that double counting?

SNOOT:  No prob.  It passed, that’s what counts.

POOP:  What Supreme Court members voted to do that?!

SNOOT:  Thought you'd never ask….The justices responsible for passage were  
Anthony M. Kennedy,  John G. Roberts Jr., Antonin Scalia, Samuel A. Alito, Jr. 
and Clarence Thomas.
POOP: That was 2010?  What was Granny D doing that year?

SNOOT:  Who?

POOP:  Thought you'd never ask….
 Granny D turned 100 years old three days after the 2010 passage of the 
Citizens United ruling. That is especially sad.

SNOOT:  How so?

POOP:  Between the ages of 88 and 90 she walked 3200 miles, from California to Washington D.C. for campaign finance reform.  Campaign financing was already a problem, even before Citizens United.

SNOOT:  Smatter of opinion.

POOP:  ….and she demonstrated at the nation’s capitol!

SNOOT:  Got arrested, I hope.

POOP:  According to Wikipedia, she  did get arrested, and said “Your Honor, to the business at hand: the old woman who stands before you was arrested for reading the Declaration of Independence in America’s Capitol Building. I did not raise my voice to do so and I blocked no hall. But if it is a crime to read the Declaration of Independence in our great hall, then I am guilty.”  The judge sentenced Granny D and her companions to time served and a $10 administrative fee.  From <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doris_Haddock#Arrest_at_the_Capitol>

SNOOT:  Oh.

Those Unwinnable Wars

Published August 25, 2021 by Nan Mykel

Pausing to think: from In Saner Thought

lobotero's avatarIn Saner Thought

Some of have asked for many years just how this country is so terrible at winning wars after such a success in WW2.

Think not?

What was the last won by the US in the last 80 years?

….Pause here for further thought….

Can’t think of one?

Why is that?

Washington’s attempts to back pro-U.S. foreign movements against incumbent regimes have amassed a similar dismal track record. Under the so-called Reagan Doctrine in the 1980s, the United States funded and equipped a number of anti-communist rebel organizations that were trying to oust left-wing regimes in the Third World. The most prominent cases included the Contras in Nicaragua and Jonas Savimbi’s UNITA faction in Angola. Both of those insurgencies ultimately failed to take power. In only one case was Washington’s support for an insurgency successful during that era – backing the mujahidin against the Soviet Union’s occupation forces in Afghanistan. However…

View original post 522 more words

Filosofa's Word

Cogito Ergo Sum

Scottie's Playtime

Come see what I share

Chronicles of an Anglo Swiss

Welcome to the Anglo Swiss World

ChatterLei

EXPRESSIONS

Anthony’s Crazy Love and Life Lessons in Empathy

Loves, lamentation, and life through prose, stories, passions, and essays.

The Life-long Education Blog

Let's Explore The Great Mystery Together!

Ned Hamson's Second Line View of the News

Second Look Behind the Headlines - News you can use...

Evolution of Medical profession-Extinction of good doctors

choosing medical career; problem faced by doctors; drawbacks of medical profession;patient tutorials

Petchary's Blog

Cries from Jamaica

Memoirs of Madness

A place where I post unscripted, unedited, soulless rants of a insomniac madman

Life Matters

CHOOSE LOVE

Mybookworld24

My Life And Everything Within It

Mitch Reynolds

Just Here Secretly Figuring Out My Gender

Frank J. Peter

A Watering Hole for Freelance Human Beings Who Still Give a Damn

Passionate about making a difference

"The only thing that stands between you and your dream is the will to try and the belief that it is actually possible." - Joel Brown