Well, Hell…NOBODY’S HOME!

Published July 10, 2022 by Nan Mykel

 

…Or this post could be titled LAST DAY OF MOTHER EARTH, (which went during a huge celebration over literally breathtaking corporate bonuses.)

Laughing can take us only so far away, however:  In a pinch it can temporarily staunch the flow…

Will Justice Thomas lead the way in overturning the Loving v Virginia decision? That would dissolve his marriage to Ginni. Is this his devious way of shedding a wife who has become a political burden? Just kidding.  (Mark Joseph Stern via dianeravitch)…

but the beat goes on….for how long?

Thankfully after Ruth Ginsberg’s passing, so she didn’t have to know.

 

 

 

 

 

 

OH, ALL RIGHT!

Published July 9, 2022 by Nan Mykel

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just a tad on logic, from the internet:

The concept of “emotive language” is a technical term used to refer to the use of specific terms that have specific argumentative effects. In particular, they can affect the interlocutor’s emotions, and lead him or her to accept or view a certain viewpoint or policy more favorably. Clearly, such words can be manipulated and become fallaciously used. Emotive use of language can be illustrated this example. Bertrand Russell, on the BBC radio in the Brains Trust program, gave three examples designed to illustrate the natural tendency to use words in a persuasive way that support one’s own view and attack an opposed view.

I am firm, you are obstinate, he is a pigheaded fool.

I am righteously indignant, you are annoyed, he is making a fuss over nothing.

I have reconsidered the matter, you have changed your mind, he has gone back on his word.

Here the wording reflects a viewpoint, pro or con. We are aware of the tendency to select words that support our own viewpoint, but generally we do not reflect very deeply on what we are doing. Even though we are aware that people are engaging in this kind of verbal persuasion all the time, we have little idea of how to defend against it in instances where it may be important to do so. It is widely accepted that definitions are trivial, and that arguing about definitions is even a sign of quibbling, characteristics of logic-chopping philosophers and lawyers. For this reason it is hard to get people to take the study of definitions seriously. If we consider some legal examples however, it can be seen how the framing of definitions is often far from trivial, and can have significant economic consequences. We will discuss some famous cases in the following blogs.

Enjoyed reading this article? Share it today

From <http://www.cambridgeblog.org/2015/03/emotive-language-in-argumentation-2/>

From <https://thebestschools.org/magazine/15-logical-fallacies-know/>

I CHANGED MY MIND

Published July 9, 2022 by Nan Mykel

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image: Pinterest.com

I am woman, hear me roar!  (Smile)….  I think I’ve discovered that I’m better at illogic than logic, given my use of emotions to express my opinions.  Anyway, I woke up this morning reflecting that the attack on the capitol was unthinkable; then another unthinkable possibility occurred to me, which made my visualized pursuit of logic shrink in its importance:

Wiping out the internet and/or the national electric grid.  We know the bad guys–spammers and the dark internet have the power to castrate our democracy just prior to an election  [misuse of emotional language]. I have seen little evidence of  honesty or tendency to “share the wealth,”  so, what could fend off their unlimited arsenal in the sabotage of democracy?

And how about the use of  armed drones!  When Trump wanted a flyover as he left the White House I wondered if he hoped for a little demolition of the White House.

Maybe a belief in hell should be brought back into vogue.

 

QUICK! TRY LOGIC!

Published July 8, 2022 by Nan Mykel

Help me spread the knowledge and the word.  As we approach the fall elections I anticipate a continued and widespread attack by Republicans by word of mouh and pen.  We’ve seen it before (and currently) but some especially hot salvos may have been postponed for their deluge closer to the election.  Due to that concern, I am calling for a widespread self education of the field of logic to help respond to any incorrect and illogical statements by the other side.  Keeping our own statements logical could also be helpful, by example.  I intend to devote several posts on this topic but in the meantime (it’s late/early)  I refer you to schools of thought.org and their little shop with free pdf materials.Welcome to our little shop. You can buy a high-quality physical product or scroll to the black bit to download all the things as free PDFs. We’re a non profit and all proceeds help make the world a more rational place   There are many other informational sites, you’ll discover if you do a search.

I have been guilty of misuse of emotional language in my recent image posting of a woman jousting with a dragon.  Since the dragon metaphorically in this case represents a large segment of the country’s population, and I know that many of them are perfectly regular people, I would be committing a fallacy by appealing to the emotions rather than logic, and my argument may very well backfire.

I wrote the following comment on Keith’s  Musings of an old fart:  (That seems not the way to do it)

I rerceived a comment from one of Keith’s other readers:  (Well, seems like you’re not supposed to quote a response to your words on another site)

I responded to her:  Correct. See what I mean? Sloppy speaking. I now recognize that there is a difference between “foetal cells” and “foetal cell lines” that originated with a woman’s abortion a half century ago.  [And mayber you’re not supposed to quote yourself at length].

I’ll just straighten this all out in my next post.  Maybe this one’s too long or there’s a limit on the number of “Saves” you can put on a draft.

Whatever, I just hope I don’t give up on my plan of defense.  I don’t know if Keith wants his photo below, but I didn’t put it on.

 

 

HE WAS A GOOD OL’ BOY

Published July 7, 2022 by Nan Mykel

Why did Van Gogh stop being a pastor

In December 1879, Vincent began his career as an evangelist. He arrived at the Borinage looking like a ‘clean Dutchman’, but he quickly found that to engage the people of this region, he would need to become one of them. In wanting to follow the example of Christ, Vincent intended to form relationships with the people he had been entrusted, regardless of who they were or what they did. He had desired to live out the gospel in a real and meaningful way. So Vincent moved out of his modest dwelling and into a hut, where he slept on a straw mattress. He gave his money, food and warm clothes to the needy.

He was self-sacrificing, determined in his convictions and was not moved by other people’s opinions. He preached the word of God and followed through with actions of love. He nursed the sick, prayed, taught the bible, then helped with the chores.

He wanted to follow the biblical scripture, to lay down one’s life,

“My commandment is this: Love each other as I have loved you. Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends.”(John 15:12–13).

This passion Vincent had, to forsake all for the poor, made the people of the religious institution very uncomfortable.

He Was Removed From His Position

The head of the mission saw Vincent’s behaviour as excessive; they did not approve of Van Gogh taking the teachings of Christ so literally. After the trial period had ended, the Committee for the Evangelical Protestant Churches judged Vincent ‘too extreme’ and they would not continue their support.

From <https://medium.com/george-st-gallery/van-gogh-was-a-pastor-before-he-was-a-painter-1d3744babc8e>

THE MORAL GROUND

Published July 6, 2022 by Nan Mykel

Christians Against Christian Nationalism campaign  was formed “to provide resources about Christian  nationalism and how it distorts Christianity and harms our neighbors. Earlier this year, BJC worked with secular partners at the Freedom From Religion Foundation to publish a comprehensive report on Christian nationalism and its role in the Jan. 6 attack. This project, which serves as a resource for lawmakers and the general public, includes the most complete record to date of how Christian nationalism helped fuel the insurrection.

Dismantling Christian nationalism starts with questioning assumptions and myths that underlie common statements, like “America is a Christian nation.” We can affirm a productive role for religion — including but not limited to Christianity — in our public square without providing Christianity or Christians a place of privilege in our laws and policy.

The constitutional framers protected religious freedom by balancing two guarantees in the First Amendment: the free exercise of religion and the prohibition against its establishment by the government.

These values are being challenged in this election year by politicians and other leaders. Doug Mastriano, the GOP’s gubernatorial nominee in Pennsylvania, participated in the “Stop the Steal” rally on Jan. 6 and has been subpoenaed by the Select Committee. He also has repeatedly blended religion and government in his public speeches, saying at one point: “We’re going to bring the state back to righteousness, this is our day, our hour to take our state back and renew the blessings of America.”

This kind of language — harking back to some idealized “time in America” — is one way that racism and white supremacy become coded into Christian nationalism. Violent extremists, such as the insurrectionists at the Capitol and more recently the shooter at the Tops supermarket in Buffalo, use Christian language and symbols in conjunction with overtly racist rantings in attempts to cloak their actions in respectability and divine authority.

The Christianity they summon and the Jesus they imagine — a white, muscular figure who seeks and wields political power — is not only not present in the Gospels, it is refuted by the Gospels.

The tumultuous events of 2020 have called the question about where we white Christians stand on white supremacy. History is recording a roll call vote that requires us to declare our position.

At this time of reckoning, we can remain loyal to our heritage and ancestors through defensiveness and inaction. Or we can rededicate ourselves to the work of handing down a healthier faith and country to our children and our children’s children. But we can’t do both.

My hope is that enough of us will awaken from the fevered nightmare of white supremacy and finally choose a future in which we work shoulder to shoulder with our Black and brown brothers and sisters to achieve the promise of a multi-racial, multi-religious America.

This post was adapted from the afterword in the paperback edition of White Too Long: The Legacy of White Supremacy in American ChristianityCopyright © 2021 by Robert P. Jones.

_________________________

From another bailiwick we find Elie Mystal in the May 2022 Nation urging we take off our gloves (or is it put them on?) in opposing SCOTUS’ overturning of Roe v. Wade:

We now live in a country where the government cannot force you to wear a mask on a plane during a pandemic but can force you to carry a pregnancy to term against your will.  It is a country where the government won’t ban certain kinds of assault rifles but will ban certain kinds of  medical care….

Mystal, who is an attorney and the justice correspondent at The Nation, where he writes about the courts,  suggests [urges] that we drop “choice” as our rallying cry against our loss of rights.  “Choice” was a rational argument, but it is insufficient as a fighting posture. “I am done ceding the moral space to Christian fundamentalists.  Forced birth–literally commandeering a person’s womb and forcing threm to incubate cells against their will–is evil and barbaric and cannot be compelled by a legitimate government….The fundamentalist program will have to be opposed–and opposed vehemently–through policy, the courts, and moral  suasion”.

Mystal urges Democrats to learn how to fight the moral battles: Perhaps it’s time for Democrats to stop trying to compromise with the Christian fundamentalists who have taken control of uteruses that don’t belong to them and start trying to fight them.

 

IS SCOTUS TRYING….

Published July 5, 2022 by Nan Mykel

Who is SCOTUS trying to please?  God?  Trump?  The Cristian Nationalists?  Their wives?

the NRA? Putin? The other saboteurs of democracy?

They surely aren’t trying to please Jesus Christ.

SAY WHAT?

Published July 4, 2022 by Nan Mykel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stand up for your rights!

Raise the roof!

It’s a hard life, so

Pay Peter to Pay Paul.

and shake up the crowd!

 

Don’t tiptoe through the tulips

You’re such a cry baby!

Lend a hand, scaredy cat

Long gone, I figure,

but you take the cake, Mate!

 

Don’t be down in the dumps

Chill out! High as a kite?

Shake a leg, hit the road

He’s a nut on a blind date

and a bear before coffee.

 

That’s a hard one to swallow,

I swan!  Give me a hand here

Get the lead out! You’re the cat’s

pajamas, knuckle head,

Too hot to trot!

AT LEAST IT ISN’T THANKSGIVING

Published July 4, 2022 by Nan Mykel

This Fourth of July I find myself running short on love of country and of myself.  Maybe that’s why I responded with so much warmth to an article about family love–either families of origin or chosen families of mutual support.  It’s in the New York Times and maybe you can only read it if you pay a dollar a week to recieve it on the internet, like I do.  Seems like the last time I tried to share I got blank squares on my site….If you can, try it:  Chosen Families, by Melissa Kirsch.  I’m not even going to try it, because I hate to see my messy posts when I do something wrong, so I’ll just try to convey some of her thoughts.

Melissa Kirsch writes in this morning’s ‘s  This Morning’s  column that despite an absent or unsupportive biological family–and even if it is intact–supportive relationships with friends and neighbors can provide welcome kinship.  Many discovered this during the pandemic

She reminds us that both families of origin and mutually chosen families can serve as a lifeline to survival. As an example of this solution she discusses how many of our fellow members of the L.G.B.T.Q.  population manage to survive and/or thrive.  Outlawed out of existence in some states, many have been able to develop mutually supportive “chosen” families.  That’s true for many of the rest of us, through luck or determination.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AT LEAST SOMEONE’S EXPERIENCING CONSEQUENCES…

Published July 3, 2022 by Nan Mykel

Australia’s Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce on June 23, 2021 in Canberra, Australia. (Getty/Kyodo)

SYDNEY – Australia’s Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce has been fined AU$200 ($151) for failing to wear a mask in a public indoor area in breach of COVID-19 public health orders, reblogged by Ned Hanson

Joyce, who just returned to the position of deputy prime minister last week after regaining leadership of the National Party, was spotted paying for fuel at a service station without wearing a mask in the New South Wales town of Armidale.

The state’s police confirmed Monday that a penalty had been issued to a 54-year old man who was found not wearing a mask in the store, following a tip provided by a member of the public on the national crime stoppers hotline.

Armidale, which sits within Joyce’s electorate about 500 kilometers north of Sydney, is currently subject to mandatory mask wearing in public indoor areas, in response to the worsening outbreak of the Delta variant in the Sydney metropolitan area.

Cr. KYODO NEWS

Scottie's Playtime

Come see what I share

Chronicles of an Anglo Swiss

Welcome to the Anglo Swiss World

ChatterLei

EXPRESSIONS

Anthony’s Crazy Love and Life Lessons in Empathy

Loves, lamentation, and life through prose, stories, passions, and essays.

The Life-long Education Blog

Let's Explore The Great Mystery Together!

Ned Hamson's Second Line View of the News

Second Look Behind the Headlines - News you can use...

Evolution of Medical profession-Extinction of good doctors

choosing medical career; problem faced by doctors; drawbacks of medical profession;patient tutorials

Petchary's Blog

Cries from Jamaica

Memoirs of Madness

A place where I post unscripted, unedited, soulless rants of a insomniac madman

Life Matters

CHOOSE LOVE

Mybookworld24

My Life And Everything Within It

Mitch Reynolds

Just Here Secretly Figuring Out My Gender

Frank J. Peter

A Watering Hole for Freelance Human Beings Who Still Give a Damn

Passionate about making a difference

"The only thing that stands between you and your dream is the will to try and the belief that it is actually possible." - Joel Brown

Yip Abides

we're all cyborgs now

annieasksyou...

Seeking Dialogue to Inform, Enlighten, and/or Amuse You and Me